We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Importance of Mucosal Closure in Nasal Septal Perforation Repair

David H. Burstein, MD1,2; Russell W. H. Kridel, MD1,2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston
2Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Houston
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(4):322-323. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2013.1504.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Cho et al1 present a novel method for repairing nasal septal perforations that they claim is easy, cost-effective, and associated with low patient morbidity. The technique involves the endonasal insertion of a polyethylene orbital implant that spans the perforation in the submucoperichondrial plane. The septal flaps are advanced as much as possible, and an inferior turbinate mucosal graft (presumably a free graft) is used in larger perforations. The technique completely relies on epithelial migration to slowly resurface the implant with mucosa. While the authors have had some success in a small series of patients, it seems to create a significant burden on the patient with regard to postoperative nasal care.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





July 1, 2013
John J. W. Cho, MD; Regan C. Taylor, MD, MSc; Michael W. Deutschmann, MD; Shamir P. Chandarana, MD, MSc; Paul A. Marck, MD
1Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
2Faculty of Medicine (Dr Taylor), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(4):275-279. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2013.840.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Related Collections