We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
In This Issue of JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery |

Highlights FREE

JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014;16(2):77. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2014.75.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Prabhat K. Bhama, MD, and colleagues provide a review of 127 patients treated with microvascular free gracilis transfer for smile reanimation over a decade. The authors report quantifiable improvement of smile excursion, angle excursion, and symmetry of the oral commissure at rest and with smiling. Associations are identified between outcome measures and intraoperative measurements. The report advocates that use of gracilis free tissue transfer as a reliable procedure for dynamic reanimation of the paralyzed oral commissure.

Journal Club

Scott A. Asher, MD, and colleagues present one of the largest series of patients (n = 115) treated with negative pressure dressings for head and neck wounds. Most patients had poor wound healing risk factors and complex neck wounds, including salivary contamination, bone exposure, great vessel exposure, recent free tissue transfer, and defects near laryngectomy stomas. The average treatment length was 4 days, and all wounds eventually healed. Four adverse reactions were reported, but there were no mortalities. The authors demonstrate the utility and safety of negative pressure wound therapy in patients with complex wounds and compromised wound healing undergoing head and neck surgery.

Marc W. Herr, MD, and colleagues evaluate the use of pedicled fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery flaps for the reconstruction of head and neck defects in 24 patients. The authors describe their experience using the versatile flap to reconstruct various defects, including the pharyngeal wall, oral cavity, and as far away as the posterolateral skull base. The average size of the defects was 8 × 10 cm, and the largest defect measured 10 × 14 cm. Technical aspects of the flap harvest are highlighted in addition to the assessment of outcomes.

Donald B. Yoo, MD, and colleagues introduce a surgical technique that combines closed canthal suspension and lower eyelid retractor recession to address lower eyelid retraction in the setting of orbicularis weakness. The retrospective review presents outcomes from 29 patients with reduced orbicularis strength and lower eyelid retraction stemming from facial nerve disease, postblepharoplasty, involutional change, or idiopathic etiology. All patients had correction of eyelid malposition postoperatively with an average correction of 1.8 mm. There were no major complications, and patient satisfaction was reported as high. The authors suggest that preserving dynamic lower eyelid muscular support in this population makes attaining satisfactory outcomes more predictable.





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.