We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Application of the Blink Assessment in Facial Transplantation

Michael Sosin, MD1; Nicholas T. Iliff, MD2; Eduardo D. Rodriguez, MD, DDS3
[+] Author Affiliations
1Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Maxillofacial Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland
2Department of Ophthalmology, The Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
3Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014;16(6):457. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2014.631.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor The importance of the blink mechanism, both volitional and reflexive, is paramount to ocular protection and health. We commend Frigerio et al1 in pursuing a novel technological application to accurately detect blink.1 In their article, Frigerio et al1 explain that the purpose of their “proof of concept” model is to validate the infrared LED system to eventually improve the treatment of facial paralysis. Our experience in complex facial reconstruction2 and vascularized composite allotransplantation, namely facial transplantation,3 has elucidated the importance of blink assessment, preservation, and restoration. Objective and novel blink assessment tools may translate not only to patients with facial paralysis but can be used in evaluating patients who undergo autologous reconstruction or facial allotransplantation. Although there is promise to the system proposed by Frigerio et al1 in computing frequency or quantifying blink, it falls short in several aspects of determining the quality and clinical relevance of the blink mechanism.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...