0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Reviewers List |

Thank You to Our Reviewers FREE

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011;13(3):142. doi:10.1001/archfacial.2011.17.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

The peer review process is one of less frequently discussed but essential foundations of modern scientific publishing. As stated in The AMA Manual of Style: A Guide for Authors and Editors, written by Cheryl Iverson and other JAMA and Archives Journals staff, “The essence of peer review consists of asking experts: ‘How important and how good is this paper, and how can it be improved?’ This use of expert consultants to advise editors about the selection and improvement of papers has become a standard quality-assessment measure in biomedical publication. It is remarkable that the peer review process depends largely on the efforts of peer reviewers who donate their time—sometimes large amounts of it.”1(p304) Information is expanding rapidly on the Internet and elsewhere. The peer review process provides an excellent, if sometimes imperfect, method to select the best science and assure our readers that knowledgeable reviewers have considered the manuscript thoughtfully. Most of the manuscripts published in the Archives journals have undergone revision based on 1 or more reviewer’s suggestions. They become better manuscripts because the authors are willing to undergo the peer review process. We would hope that even rejected manuscripts benefit by conscientious peer review, which can help the authors improve their manuscripts for future submissions. On behalf of the editorial board and all of our readers, we would like to thank the individuals who participated in this peer review process during 2010.

Peter A. Adamson Bryan Ambro Richard L. Anderson Shelia Anderson Fazil Apaydin Babak Azizzadeh Shan R. Baker Lucy J. Barr Alexander Berghaus Amit Bhrany Keith E. Blackwell Jason David Bloom Kofi Derek O. Boahene Patrick J. Byrne Paul J. Carniol Minas Constantinides Steven H. Dayan Jaimie DeRosa Yadranko Ducic David Ellis Edward Ellis Donald Gregory Farwell Fred G. Fedok Andrew S. Frankel Oren Friedman Jaime R. Garza Holger Guenther Gassner Grant S. Gillman Mark J. Glasgold Robert Alan Goldberg Tessa A. Hadlock Jason S. Hamilton Peter Hilger Marcelo Hochman J. David Holcomb Rich Holt Carlo P. Honrado George J. Hruza Koen Ingels Perry J. Johnson Nick S. Jones Gregory S. Keller Robert M. Kellman Douglas J. Kibblewhite Mimi S. Kokoska Theda C. Kontis J. David Kriet Keith A. LaFerriere Samuel M. Lam William Lawson Samson Lee Robin Lindsay Susan E. Mackinnon Benjamin C. Marcus Lawrence J. Marentette Kris S. Moe Eric Jason Moore Sam P. Most Jeffrey S. Moyer Craig S. Murakami Farhad B. Naini Pietro Palma Ira D. Papel Stephen S. Park José A. Patrocinio Lucas G. Patrocinio Jonathan A. Perkins Harrison C. Putman David Reiter Gerhard Rettinger John S. Rhee James Ridgway Russell Ries Thomas Romo III Scott B. Roofe Hesham Saleh Sherris Allan Sherris James D. Sidman Kathy Sie Bryan S. Sires Lee E. Smith Benjamin Collin Stong Abel-Jan Tasman Sherard A. Tatum J. Regan Thomas Travis T. Tollefson Dean M. Toriumi William H. Truswell Tom D. Wang Mark K. Wax Ivan Wayne William Werschler Edwin F. Williams Catherine P. Winslow Frederick T. C. Wong Joseph K. Wong Ritchie Younger John A. Zitelli Christopher Isaac Zoumalan Richard Abraham Zoumalan

REFERENCES

Iverson  CChristiansen  SFlanagin  A  et al.  AMA Manual of Style: A Guide for Authors and Editors. 10th ed. New York, NY Oxford University Press2007;304

Figures

Tables

References

Iverson  CChristiansen  SFlanagin  A  et al.  AMA Manual of Style: A Guide for Authors and Editors. 10th ed. New York, NY Oxford University Press2007;304

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

355 Views
0 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs