0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

High-Impact Articles—Citations, Downloads, and Altmetric Score FREE

John S. Rhee, MD, MPH1,2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Medical College of Wisconsin Clinic at Froedtert West, Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Milwaukee
2Editor, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17(5):323-324. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0869.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

As the editor, I have the honor and pleasure of reading and reviewing the best manuscripts in the discipline of facial plastic surgery. I am often asked the questions by potential authors: “What is JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery looking for in an article? What are the factors in deciding which articles are accepted for publication?” I have pointed to my inaugural editorial1 that describes our mission and vision statement that articulates 3 key themes—showcasing the best science, educating our targeted readership, and framing the contemporary and key issues of our time. However, I’ve often wondered if there was a more concise or visually crisp way to articulate my message.

Now, fortunately, through the creativity of our web and media team, the new JAMA Network article dashboard captures the essence of what our journal desires—that is, “the high-impact article”—the number of citations, number of downloads, and altmetric score (Figure). These 3 metrics are not all-inclusive or all that matters, but they do represent the 3 distinct themes I’ve mentioned: metrics that make an article desirable from a journal perspective.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.
Screenshot of Article Webpage

Dashboard is outlined by red box.

Graphic Jump Location

The citation metric is one that is likely most familiar and recognized by the scientific community. There are metrics such as H-index for authors (based on number of citations and publications) that are used by academic institutions as one consideration in faculty promotion decisions. Impact factors for journals are calculated by counting all of the citations to every article published in a journal divided by the number of “substantial” articles (original research, long reviews, special communications) published in that specific journal during the 2 preceding years. This 2-year window is a difficult one for more clinically based journals like JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery because even landmark clinical studies or reviews often experience a lag in terms of its citation frequency as opposed to basic science articles that tend to be cited more frequently since the knowledge and reporting cycle runs on a faster pace. On our website, “the most cited” recently published article is a review on complications related to injectable soft-tissue filler (>3400 views, 16 citations, altmetric score of 3).2

What else is important for article selections beyond the possibility of an article being cited? Readership interest is another key component, with number of recent article downloads being a metric that describes this factor. This may be a scientific article (often clinical science) or an educationally focused article—for example, an in-depth topic review, surgical vignette, or an opinion piece. On our website the “most read” (ie, downloaded) article in the past 31 days is a full-length clinical article on the topic of thread-lift complications (>23 000 views, 2 citations, altmetric score of 9).3 However, even the short educational piece (a Surgical Pearl) by Chu and Davis4 that was published online as recently as May 15, 2015,4 has close to 1100 views. In essence, this metric is describing what makes this journal a valuable resource.

Finally, in the age of social media, public interest and readership excitement is captured by an altmetric score—essentially an assessment of the article’s online attention (news coverage, blogs, Twitter, Facebook). Usually a clinical study on a topic that may have some public interest or a Viewpoint that is edgy or frames a controversial topic will have high altmetric scores. The recent article Reilly et al5 on the topic of the effect of facial rejuvenation surgery on perceived attractiveness, femininity, and personality is an example of an article that resonated with online and public interest (686 views, 1 citations, altmetric score of 95). In essence, this metric is describing what makes this journal relevant, interesting, and entertaining.

I encourage you to spend some time reviewing and surfing through our webpages. The JAMA Network web team has made this experience enjoyable and enriching—truly an enhanced experience that goes beyond traditional print pages. Remember that our journal publishes new content weekly, not merely bimonthly via the print journal—new content is posted online first every week. With our email alerts, you will be notified when new content is available that you can access via your computer, tablet, and phone. If you have not already signed up for the JAMA Network Reader (http://www.jnreader.com), please do so; it’s the best way to have immediate, free access to the contents of not only JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery but to all of the JAMA Network journals.

As always, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery is committed to publishing articles with the most impact (citations, downloads, altmetric score), and I look forward to improving and advancing in all of the metrics that support the growing story of success for our journal.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Corresponding Author: John S. Rhee, MD, MPH, Medical College of Wisconsin Clinic at Froedtert West, Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (jrhee@mcw.edu).

Published Online: July 30, 2015. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0869.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

REFERENCES

Rhee  JS.  Faces of change: passing of the torch in JAMA Facial Plastic SurgeryJAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17(1):7.
Link to Article
Daines  SM, Williams  EF  III.  Complications associated with injectable soft-tissue fillers: a 5-year retrospective review. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(3):226-231.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Abraham  RF, DeFatta  RJ, Williams  EF  III.  Thread-lift for facial rejuvenation: assessment of long-term results. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(3):178-183.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Chu  E, David  RE.  SMAS debulking for management of the thick-skinned nose. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17(4):305-306. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0361.
Link to Article
Reilly  MJ, Tomsic  JA, Fernandez  SJ, Davison  SP.  Effect of facial rejuvenation surgery on perceived attractiveness, femininity, and personality. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17(3):202-207.
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.
Screenshot of Article Webpage

Dashboard is outlined by red box.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Rhee  JS.  Faces of change: passing of the torch in JAMA Facial Plastic SurgeryJAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17(1):7.
Link to Article
Daines  SM, Williams  EF  III.  Complications associated with injectable soft-tissue fillers: a 5-year retrospective review. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(3):226-231.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Abraham  RF, DeFatta  RJ, Williams  EF  III.  Thread-lift for facial rejuvenation: assessment of long-term results. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(3):178-183.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Chu  E, David  RE.  SMAS debulking for management of the thick-skinned nose. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17(4):305-306. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0361.
Link to Article
Reilly  MJ, Tomsic  JA, Fernandez  SJ, Davison  SP.  Effect of facial rejuvenation surgery on perceived attractiveness, femininity, and personality. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17(3):202-207.
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

3,728 Views
4 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs