We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
In This Issue of JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery |

Highlights FREE

JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17(5):319. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2014.954.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Walliczek and colleagues sought to measure keloid recurrence rate and changes in quality of life, using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) scale after multimodal therapy, which included surgical excision followed by steroid injections and pressure therapy. A total of 33 patients (42 auricle keloids) were treated, with the recurrence rate reported as 8%. Insecure handling of the pressure splint significantly correlated with a higher relapse rate. Improvement in quality of life as measured by GBI after keloid treatment was significant in recurrence-free patients.

Barham and coauthors evaluated the effectiveness of cephalic crural turn-in maneuver and costal cartilage lateral crural strut grafts for correcting external nasal valve dysfunction. Assessment of patient benefit was based on the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale (NOSE) scores. A Likert scale was also used to assess overall function and cosmesis. Objective assessment included postdecongestion nasal peak inspiratory flow, nasal airway resistance, and minimum cross-sectional area. Both techniques were found to be effective in improving patient-reported outcomes and nasal peak inspiratory flow for correction of external valve dysfunction. In the accompanying Invited Commentary, Most frames these findings in the context of the broader issue of the need to unify terminology for lateral nasal wall insufficiency.

Chambers and colleagues conducted a prospective observational study to evaluate the change in disease-specific quality of life and to determine whether identifiable anatomical risk factors were more common in patients who underwent nasal valve correction after failed septoplasty. Forty patients were enrolled with Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores collected preoperatively and at 2, 4, and more than 6 months after surgery. The most common anatomical cause of obstruction was internal nasal valve narrowing in 38 patients (95%), dorsal septum deflection in 26 (65%), and narrowed middle vault in 16 (40%). Surgical nasal valve correction demonstrated a significant improvement in NOSE scores in patients for whom a previous septoplasty had failed.

Harris and Sundaram conducted a prospective, open-label trial to assess the safety and efficacy of microfocused ultrasonography with visualization for improving laxity of the skin of the face and neck in 52 adults with Fitzpatrick skin types III to VI. There were 3 reported adverse events described as raised areas of mild edema or welts (2 events) and moderately severe prolonged erythema with mild scabbing (1 event). All events resolved after 90 days without sequelae. In the accompanying Invited Commentary, Arosarena discusses the importance of and need for additional clinical trials in patients with darker skin types.





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.