0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Viewpoint |

Standard Outcome Measures in Facial Paralysis Getting on the Same Page

Tessa Hadlock, MD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016;18(2):85-86. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2015.2095.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

This viewpoint discusses agreement regarding standard outcome measurements as being critical to advancing the treatment of patients diagnosed with facial paralysis.

Clinicians caring for patients with facial paralysis (FP) are universally interested in improving outcomes by developing and/or embracing treatment approaches that advance functional recovery, improve aesthetic outcome, and/or restore nonverbal communication ability. In facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, increasing emphasis on outcomes1 has driven the development of myriad assays to measure the effects of therapy. Some assays have been statistically validated and tested for internal consistency, applying varying degrees of rigor, though many remain inadequately tested. Because of the high complexity and broad range of deficits that patients diagnosed with FP experience, agreement regarding standard outcomes measures has been particularly elusive. In the current era, agreement regarding these measures is critical to advancing care. Deep experience with the condition over the past several decades has permitted leaders to begin to agree on certain elements essential to progress in FP treatment.2

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

275 Views
0 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();