We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
In This Issue of JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery |

Highlights FREE

JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016;18(4):239. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2015.1230.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Dey and colleagues examine the impact of facial defects on quality of life and willingness to pay, as perceived by society, and highlights the quality of life penalty associated with facial defects and the value society places on their surgical reconstruction. Observers viewed images of faces with defects of varying sizes and locations before and after surgical reconstruction. They imagined if the defect in each image were on their own face and rated their health state utility with the defect and how much they would be willing to pay to have the defect surgically repaired to normal (perfect repair). They were willing to pay an average of $1170 to repair a small peripheral defect; they were willing to pay $4274 more than the average to repair a large defect and $2372 more to repair a central defect.

Gaudin and colleagues sought to establish the correlation between the scores on the eFACE, an electronic and digitally graded facial measurement scale, and the Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale (FGS) among patients with facial paralysis and to compare the reliability of the 2 scales. Two independent physical therapists evaluated patients using both the eFACE and the Sunnybrook FGS. Scores were compared, and the Spearman rank correlation coefficient was calculated between the total scores and each of the 3 subscores, including static, dynamic, and synkinesis scores. They found moderately good agreement between the Sunnybrook FGS and the eFACE. Given the ease of using the eFACE on mobile devices, the authors propose that eFACE may represent a reasonable facial grading option across disciplines in the future.

Ratnarathorn and coauthors used an internet-based survey to compare the perceived cosmetic appearance of linear vs zigzag facial scars by the general public in white men and women of different ages. A computer-generated image of a mature scar was designed in linear and zigzag configurations and overlaid on the faces of standardized headshots of 4 white individuals. Respondents rated each scar on the 10-point Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. They found that the lay public had a significantly better perception of the appearance of linear scars compared with zigzag scars in 3 facial locations (temple, cheek, and forehead).

In this review, Rodman and Kridel propose a novel classification system for patients presenting for revision rhinoplasty for the purposes of helping patients understand the complexity of the repair required, facilitate exchange of information between surgeons, and potentially allow for meaningful comparisons of surgical techniques and evaluations of outcomes of rhinoplasty procedures. They describe 3 major components that determine the overall difficulty of surgery for revision rhinoplasty. In the PGS system, “P” represents “problem,” consisting of the specific anatomic anomaly; “G,” for “graft,” based on the number of grafts required; and “S,” for “number of previous surgical procedures.” In addition, they include a category “E,” for “patient expectations.”




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.