We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery |

Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery FREE

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;10(3):151. doi:10.1001/archfaci.10.3.151.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Hossam M.T. Foda, MD, discusses a retrospective series of 120 patients who presented for rhinoplasty to correct the aesthetic and functional problems resulting from loss of the caudal septal and premaxillary support. In most cases, the caudal septal deficiencies followed previous surgical excisions. An external rhinoplasty approach was used in all cases. The lost nasal tip support was reconstructed using a cartilaginous caudal septum replacement graft that was combined with premaxillary augmentation using a roll of Mersilene mesh, which improved the support and stability of the graft. The technique used provided excellent support to the nasal tip, allowing it to maintain its position over the long-term follow-up (1-12 years). No cases of infection, displacement, or extrusion were encountered. The surgical technique is described in detail, and the impressive operative results are well illustrated.

See Article


Evaluation of outcomes in facial plastic surgery is a difficult task owing to the subjective nature of this field. There has been a surge in literature with validated instruments for both patient-reported as well as clinically measured outcomes. John S. Rhee, MD, MPH, and Brian T. McMullin, MD, conducted a thorough review of existing outcome measures in facial plastic surgery literature. They evaluate the validity and reliability of the measures, make recommendations on how to integrate existing measures into future studies, and highlight the challenges in this evolving field.

See Article


Various surgical procedures are available for correction of nasal valve collapse. Intranasal Z-plasty has been used in treatment of nasal valve stenosis and cleft nasal deformities. Jay M. Dutton, MD, and Marci J. Neidich, MD, performed a retrospective medical chart review of 12 patients who underwent intranasal Z-plasty for internal valve collapse. The mean duration of follow-up was 16.8 months. Ten patients underwent bilateral surgery, and 2 patients underwent unilateral surgery. Each patient's nasal obstruction was rated on a subjective scale of 0 to 10 (10 indicating total nasal obstruction). The mean preoperative (postoperative) score was 7.17 (3.25). Mean improvement score was 3.29 (P < .001). The authors conclude that intranasal Z-plasty is a safe and minimally invasive technique that does not require open rhinoplasty and requires local anesthesia with or without sedation. It is, however, technically challenging, and there is a learning curve involved.

See Article


Anderson's tripod theory has been a dominant theory of nasal tip dynamics in rhinoplasty for the past 4 decades. Recent trends in nasal ideals and appreciation for ethnic variations have challenged the traditional thinking about the tripod concept. Richard W. Westreich, MD, and William Lawson, MD, DDS, expand on previous knowledge of the traditional tripod model while incorporating the cartilage’s intrinsic and external forces as an integral part of nasal tip position. They argue that the lower lateral cartilages act as a cantilevered spring tripod that has a single point of rigid fixation: the caudal septum. A discussion of balance of the intrinsic and extrinsic forces that ultimately determine the final nasal tip position and demonstrative cases are provided.

See Article

Margaret of Austria by Jean Hey (also known as the Master of Moulins) (active fourth quarter of the 15th century).

See Article

This issue's Highlights were written by Joseph Shvidler, MD.




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.