0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery |

Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery FREE

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;10(6):367. doi:10.1001/archfaci.10.6.367.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

THE INFRACARTILAGINOUS APPROACH REVISITED

As the external rhinoplasty approach continues to increase in popularity for even minor nasal corrections, endonasal techniques are being taught and used less frequently. The controversy regarding the ideal approach to the nasal tip continues to be debated, and Abel-Jan Tasman, MD, and Pietro Palma, MD, describe the infracartilaginous approach as an elegant variant of the endonasal rhinoplasty and advocate its use as an alternative to the external approach for many procedures, including correction of marked nasal tip abnormalities in particular.

See page 370

FACE TO FACE PROGRAM: THE FIRST 17 YEARS

Face to Face, the pro bono arm of the Educational and Research Foundation of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (AAFPRS), was initially created in 1991 for a humanitarian teaching and surgical mission to Ekaterinberg, Russia. Since then, the program has expanded into a multitude of humanitarian efforts, has treated over 1000 adults and children worldwide, and has referred over 2500 patients who have experienced domestic violence to volunteer surgeons within the United States. From the inaugural Russian trip to the development of the National Domestic Violence Program to many still-evolving programs, Minas Constantinides, MD, traces the 17-year history of Face to Face, revealing a story of compassion, commitment, and perseverance by AAFPRS members who continue to make Face to Face a philanthropic success.

See page 433

ADVANCES IN CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY

Since the pioneering work of Paul Tessier, MD, almost 40 years ago, treatment of congenital or acquired deformities of the craniofacial skeleton and soft tissue continues to face many challenges. Sherard A. Tatum, MD, and William D. Losquadro, MD, highlight major advances in craniofacial surgery over the past 10 years, including progress in distraction osteogenesis, the development of endoscopic techniques, and advances in 3-dimensional imaging, computer simulation, and intraoperative navigation that have led to enhanced diagnosis, operative planning, and better surgical outcomes with decreased morbidity. They also discuss the rising frequency of deformational plagiocephaly and the emerging role of genetics in further improving diagnosis, counseling, and treatment of patients with craniofacial disorders.

See page 433

LASERS AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY

Lasers are playing an increasingly more prominent role in the facial plastic surgeon's armamentarium. Edward C. Wu, BS, and Brian J. F. Wong, MD, PhD, summarize the major uses of lasers today, including skin rejuvenation, hair removal, treatment for pigmented lesions, and laser lipolysis. They also detail the improvement of existing applications and emergence of newer technologies such as epidermal cooling, fractional ablation, photodynamic therapy, nanoparticles, and spectroscopy. These further refinements of laser and optical technology made in the last decade not only make laser therapy safer, more accurate, and easier today, but continued development in individualizing therapy will lead to “smarter” treatments that will benefit both patients and physicians alike.

See page 376

End of the Season by William Merritt Chase (1849-1916).

See page 381

This issue's Highlights were written by Amit Bhrany, MD.

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

215 Views
0 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs