0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery |

Highlights of Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery FREE

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(1):5. doi:10.1001/archfacial.2008.520.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

THE CASE FOR OPEN FOREHEAD REJUVENATION: A REVIEW OF 1004 PROCEDURES

For decades, open brow-lift procedures have been the criterion standard for forehead and brow rejuvenation. However, since its introduction in the early 1990s, the endoscopic brow-lift has emerged as the preferred technique for many surgeons, with proponents citing reduced complication rates and superior results compared with standard open techniques. Benjamin W. Cilento, MD, and Calvin M. Johnson Jr, MD, reviewed over 1000 consecutive open forehead rejuvenation cases, finding that their complication rates are equal to, if not lower than, those published for endoscopic brow-lift series. They also demonstrate a very high patient satisfaction rate and explore the possible biases introduced by surgeons when recommending a surgical approach to forehead rejuvenation.

See Article

AUTOLOGOUS FAT GRAFTING: LONG-TERM EVIDENCE OF ITS EFFICACY IN MIDFACIAL REJUVENATION

Facial fat grafting has become an increasingly popular technique for facial rejuvenation. Its effectiveness in volume retention after transplantation is debated in part owing to a paucity of objective clinical data following facial fat grafting. Jason D. Meier, MD, and colleagues used 3-dimensional photography software in 33 patients, demonstrating a mean 32% retention of volume at 16 months and providing the first clinical quantification of autologous fat transfer reported in the literature.

See Article

FREE CARTILAGE GRAFTS AND HEALING BY SECONDARY INTENTION: A VIABLE RECONSTRUCTIVE COMBINATION AFTER EXCISION OF NONMELANOMA SKIN CANCER IN THE NASAL ALAR REGION

Reconstruction of nasal alar defects ranges from secondary intention, skin grafts, composite grafts, local nasal flaps, and 2-stage interpolated flaps from either the cheek or forehead. Nonanatomic cartilage grafts are often placed to prevent alar notching. These grafts are typically covered by vascularized tissue, but Paul A. van der Eerden, MD, and colleagues present a technique of a free cartilage graft placed in subcutaneous pockets of the ala in combination with secondary intention as an alternative, simple, 1-stage method of reconstructing relatively small but deep defects of the alar subunit and nasal side wall of the nose with little morbidity for the patient.

See Article

INJECTABLE CARTILAGE: USING ALGINATE AND HUMAN CHONDROCYTES

In facial plastic surgery, repairing cartilage defects is often limited by a lack of available cartilage and morbidity related to harvest, requiring the use of implants that have varying success. Tissue engineered cartilage offers the possibility of producing durable implants that are biologically inert and identical to the tissue being replaced, in addition to causing minimal morbidity. Eric J. Dobratz, MD, and colleagues successfully produced engineered cartilage within mice using human chondrocytes and alginate in an injectable model that allowed for in situ molding of the injection. The cartilage remained stable throughout the study period and was relatively similar to native cartilage on explanation. This model may provide the foundation to develop ideal injectable cartilage implant.

See Article

Girl Before a Mirror by Pablo Picasso (1881-1973).

See Article

This issue's Highlights were written by Amit Bhrany, MD.

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

219 Views
0 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs