0
Editorial |

Science and Business:  Dilemmas and Decisions

Wayne F. Larrabee Jr, MD
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999;1(3):158. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

PEER-REVIEWED MEDICAL journals are increasingly involved in dilemmas created by complex financial relationships between their scientist authors and the world of business.

To accomplish the journal mission, editors and reviewers must be aware of any conflicts of interest and create a system and environment where any associated bias is minimized.

Approximately 20 years ago Herbert Boyer, a professor of molecular biology at the University of California, San Francisco, founded the Genentech Corporation, San Francisco. Since then, the rise of biotechnology companies with university affiliations has necessitated detailed contracts to balance academic and scientific ideals with corporate business needs. Patents, license agreements, publishing rights, and similar issues have required compromises on both sides. In the smaller universe of facial plastic surgery research, our authors work closely not only with biotechnology companies but with many others as well to develop biomaterials, lasers, new surgical devices, etc. These are usually positive partnerships where the physicians bring new ideas and the ability to evaluate them to a company with the resources to create technology that potentially helps our patients. Many of our most creative researchers have close relationships to biomedical companies. These corporations also benefit the scientific and educational programs of our medical societies.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
/>
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Chapter 17.1. Spectrum Bias

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Chapter 20.1. Reporting Bias

brightcove.createExperiences();