Lip augmentation has become an increasingly popular procedure over the past decade, coinciding with the increased emphasis placed on larger, fuller lips in the public media.1-2 New advances in synthetic materials have created a plethora of choices for both the facial plastic surgeon and consumers who choose to undergo lip augmentation.3 There has also been an increasing trend and emphasis on less invasive techniques for facial rejuvenation coinciding with the increase in popularity and publicity of cosmetic surgery. Many manufacturers have attempted to parlay the public’s desire for quick and painless methods for cosmetic enhancement into unregulated sale of over-the-counter noninvasive products with the promise of results similar to time-tested surgical and nonsurgical methods. We chose to examine one such product that offers a quick and painless method of providing lip augmentation. We undertook a prospective study of 7 patients to determine if this product offered quantitative results based on measurements of digital photographs taken before and after the procedure.
Figure. Lip measurements used in the present study. A, Measurements from the anteroposterior view: (1) midline white lip, (2) lateral white lip, (3) total midline red lip, (4) total lateral red lip; reference line at nasal base is shown in red. B, Measurements taken from the lateral view: (1) upper lip projection and (2) lower lip projection.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 4
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
More Listings atJAMACareerCenter.com >
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.